Efficient Banking

Posted by

Background

After the restoration of democracy, Nepal has adopted more liberal and open economic policies. The process of economic liberalisation and reforms in the financial sector introduced in the early 1980s has led to significant changes in the banking industry. The open and liberal policy of the government in the financial sector has helped in establishing many banks and financial institutions in the country. These banks have contributed towards the introducing new technology, new banking systems and efficient service delivery in the country. These banks have been contributing inline with the thrust of economic liberalization and financial sector reform, i.e., making the financial system more competitive, efficient and profitable.

Consolidation in Banking Industry

Banking industry was booming until a decade back. But, economic slowdown during that period started affecting their performance of commercial banks. This led to consolidation of banking industry resulting into merger between banks and merger of development banks and finance companies with commercial banks and development banks.

Competitive Banking

Banking sector in Nepal is highly fragmented, especially in comparison with other key economies. Competition in the banking industry is increasing with great intensity. The principle of ‘survival of the fittest’ will hold good under such a scenario. Therefore, a bank has to increase its efficiency to win the competition.

Efficiency in Banking

Efficiency of banks can be measured using different parameters. The concept of productivity and profitability can be applied while evaluating efficiency of banks. The term productivity refers to the relationship between the quantity of inputs employed and the quantity of outputs produced. The input in the banking industry can be referred to the costs involved in producing the products and services, e.g., interest expenses, staff costs, operating costs. As there is difficulty in measuring the quantity of output produced by banks, the amount of income can be used to measure output of banking products.

Which Banks are More Efficient?

An increase in productivity means that more output can be produced from same inputs or same outputs can be produced from fewer inputs. Banking efficiency is mainly measured by the ratios ROA (Return on Assets, computed as net profit for the year divided by average assets deployed to earn the profit) and ROE (Return on Equity, computed as net profit for the year divided by average equity capital deployed during the year). To measure the efficiency of banks in detail, five parameters are generally used, viz., other income to interest income(OI/II); interest expenses to interest income (IE/II); staff cost to net interest income and other income [SC/(NII+OI)]; operating expenses to net interest income and other income[OE/(NII+OI)]; and operating profit to total income (OP/TI). 

To compare the efficiency of banks, 18 banks of Nepal on the basis of age of operation has been selected and the result has been presented in the table below:

Efficient Banking, LD Mahat

Return on Assets (ROA): In terms of ROA, SCB is the best bank followed by NABIL and ADBL. This ratio is mainly guided by interest rate spread followed by earnings of non-interest income and cost efficiency. Although interest rate spread of SCB (5.06%) is lower than that of ADB (5.46%), it has been able to achieve the best ROA due to earnings of non-interest income. Similarly, NABIL has beaten ADBL, RBB, NBL and NSBI despite having lower spread mainly due to earnings of non-interest income. NIC is at the bottom of the 18 banks.

Return on Equity (ROE): Computation of ROE is important on two ground. First, an increase in earnings available to shareholders leads to increase in shareholders’ value. Second, in well-functioning competitive markets, the maximisation of shareholders’ value will lead to efficient allocation of capital. In this front, RBB is the leader followed by NABIL and EBL. NBB and LBL are at the bottom of the 18 banks.

Other Income to Interest Income (OI/II): In terms of this ratio, SCB is the best bank followed by NBB and NABIL. On the other hand, NIC and MBL are at the bottom of the 18 banks. NBB has been able to secure second position mainly due to bank guarantee business in significant volume. Banks with higher ratio can be considered efficient, but also vulnerable in the sense that a reduction in other income will hit the profitability.

Interest Expenses to Interest Income (IE/II): Interest expenses to interest income ratio shows the efficiency of banks in mobilising resources at lower costs and investing in high yielding assets. In other words, it reflects the efficiency in the use of funds. Two of the public sector banks – RBB and NBL are most efficient banks under this parameter while NCC is the most inefficient bank.

Staff Cost to Net Interest Income and Other Income [SC/(NII+OI)]: NCC has the highest ratio signifying worst performance. This could be probably due to recent mergers yet to achieve synergy perceived by the management. Staff efficiency of NIBL is the best followed by NABIL.

Operating Expenses to Net Interest Income and Other Income [OE/(NII+OI)]: NCC has the highest ratio signifying worst performance. This could be probably due to recent mergers yet to achieve synergy perceived by the management. NABIL and NBL are efficient banks are they have the lowest ratio in the industry.

Operating Profit to Total Income (OP/TI): The operating profit to total income ratio helps in assessing whether banks are doing the right things internally. In this front, SCB is the best bank followed by NBL and NABIL. NCC is the worst bank. This may be due to negative synergy of merger. This bank, however, has managed better ROA and ROE due to recovery of non-performing loan.

Conclusion

The analysis of operational efficiency of banks will help one in understanding extent of the vulnerability of banks under the changed scenario and in deciding whom to bank upon. This may also help the inefficient banks upgrade their efficiency and be winner in the situations developing due to slowdown in the economy. The regulators should also be concerned on the fact that the banks with unfavourable ratios may bring catastrophe in the banking industry. 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.